August 2006
Monthly Archive
Thu 31 Aug 2006
Posted by Warwick under
Rant[2] Comments
If no one purchased stolen goods the burglary rate would crash to almost zero.
Spammers send tens of millions of e-mails to find the desperate one-in-10-million schmuck who actually believes that providence has sent him an anonymous stock tip so good he must buy it now or that member enlargement can be sent through the post.
If they didn’t buy you and I wouldn’t get Spam - period. I am not sure what direct steps could be taken to stop the Spam equivalent of ‘receiving stolen goods’ but we should start thinking about it.
Thu 31 Aug 2006
Posted by Warwick under
RantNo Comments
New Zealand’s largest ISP Xtra now blocks inbound Port 25 traffic by default when you set up an ADSL account with them. So, unless you specifically ask them to open this port, your mail server will not be able to receive email from other mail servers.
Like a lot of the actions Telecom (Xtra’s parent company) takes this is one part crass commercial exploitation and one part showmanship. It makes using Xtra’s own mail server the path of least resistance and this adds to Xtra’s revenues. It is also a token gesture against Spammers.
Xtra blocking inbound mail has some irony for us as Xtra’s network is a source of a huge amount of Spam to our customers. They have, to date, shown little energy to remedy this.
Wed 30 Aug 2006
I had a meeting today with a customer of 16 years and he brought up that we should be telling him more about what we are doing for him. That we should keep him informed about our SPAM service upgrade and the like. I was disappointed that he didn’t know about many of the information services we provide and more disappointed that we had done such a poor job telling people about them. So here’s a list of the feedback services you get from us when you are on a LANcom 770 support plan.
NEWSLETTERS AND BLOGS
- This blog. www.lancom.co.nz/blog
- Our monthly e-mail newsletter (e-mail sales@lancom.co.nz and ask to be put on the list)
- Our very popular weekly MS Office Secrets newsletter that gives a new office secret tip every week.(e-mail sales@lancom.co.nz and ask to be put on the list)
MONTHLY
- Monthly activity report presented at your site during the monthly IT strategy meeting
- Printed transcripts of all work done on your site with your monthly billing
WEEKLY
- Weekly call by the helpdesk to confirm all jobs closed and review status of current open ones.
Online Control Console
Log on the Online Control Console 24×7 to access the following
- Current open tasks (add new ones here too!)
- Online transcripts updated daily of all work done on your site
- Internet traffic usage reports broken down by computer
- Uptime and downtime of your critical servers.
- Online records of all backup checks done on your server
- Online Key Performance indicators for our service agreement (average time to respond, average time idle for jobs)
- Historical invoices.
And that’s off the top of my head.
More as I recall them
Tue 29 Aug 2006
The ’site:’ command
Many web sites have poor searches that are slow and inconclusive. You can get Google (www.google.com) to search that site for you by typing site: and then the web site you want to search. For example, I find Microsoft’s search engine slow and it is often not clear if the whole site is being searched. By visiting Google putting site:www.microsoft.com exchange in the search field I am searching all pages at www.microsoft.com with the word ‘exchange’ somewhere in the content
Wed 23 Aug 2006
Posted by Warwick under
Rant ,
GeneralNo Comments
Fact 1: Modern computers systems can be configured to allow or restrict what users can do during their time on the computer.
Fact 2: In many companies employees spend most of their work day on computers.
It is the habit of managers to link these two facts and try and to use the security and management tools that come with their computer systems to manage their workers. This is a mistake. We receive requests to give read access to certain areas, restrict access at certain times – generally force people to do things they are doing but management would prefer they didn’t.
Unfortunately this is mostly doomed for failure for two reasons. Firstly these systems tools are primarily to maintain the security and integrity of the computer system. So that when they are pointed at people there it is invariably a poor fit with unintended consequences. The most costly unintended consequence is where someone is stopped from doing their legitimate work. Secondly, by defining the rules by the computer system this legitimises work arounds. If you use the firewall to stop Internet chat and a user finds ‘a workaround’ then this must be OK because the rule is defined by the computer system restrictions.
There are exceptions, where the stakes are high (e.g. your HR documents) or where there are no other management processes available (e.g. computer systems for students at a university campus). Everywhere else setting expectations from workers is for the company manual and job review meetings.
Mon 21 Aug 2006
In the last month we have upgraded our SPAM filtering. We have noticed a big decrease in the amount of SPAM getting through. If you use our filtering service you should have noticed this too. This decrease will make everyone happy.
The difference in the new IronPort technology we are using is the introduction of what they call a ‘reputation filter’. All Ironport appliances around the world report back to the IronPort HQ on suspicious traffic. By comparing suspicious traffic reports from different IronPort appliances when a match is made the sender in question is very likely to be a SPAMmer.
Previous technology mainly used content scanning (which IronPort uses as a second level defence) where the content of the e-mail was analysed according to the rules of the AntiSpam vendor. These rules had become much less effective as SPAMmers continued to craft e-mails to get around them.
Fri 18 Aug 2006
It’s Friday and your week is running out.
Can you, hand on heart, say you know whether you have successful backups this week? Having no backup is the only computer failure from which there is no way to recover.
Fri 18 Aug 2006
Well not EVERYTHING. But in many industries it will change the landscape beyond recognition. This is the first in a continuing series where I will try to point my customers to online resources that can far better explain what the Internet means for their industry. Main stream media (TV, newspapers, magazines) has been deeply affected by the online revolution. The biggest NZ paper, the NZ Herald, has a free edition online. I am sure some of the management hates this but if they don’t give it away there are plenty of free alternatives and they will lose that customer’s attention forever. With the blogging explosion journalists are grasping at what makes a blogger different from a journalist apart from the pay packet. Journalists are struggling with this question because the difference is very often hard to discern. It makes fascinating reading.
Jeff Jarvis who has a long and successful journalistic career in the main stream media has been blogging these issues for a number of years and is a great place to start. His widely read blog is called buzzmachine
Thu 17 Aug 2006
Posted by Warwick under
Rant ,
GeneralNo Comments
Security is very topical right now. As I write there are huge queues at the airports of the US and Europe where people are being stripped of nail scissors and baby formula before they can board their aircraft. I have my doubts about the effectiveness of a lot of these measures and therefore the possible motivations for them but I can’t be sure. Aircraft security is not my area of expertise.
Information Technology is my area of expertise and I have concerns over the application of security. There is no argument that computer systems security is necessary. If you are connected to the Internet you should have properly configured firewalls, Anti virus protection, Spam protection, strong passwords policies and more. There are sound reasons for these deployments.
But I do regularly come across sites that are vigorously locked down and users denied wanted productivity features in the name of security and I can’t see why. Microsoft’s Group Policy is a common example. Group policy is a brilliant set of tools for managing 100s and 1000s of desktops but the cost/benefit equation on 25 desktops is often marginal (to be kind). Yet I have seen IT managers at some such sites obsessed with Group Policy, locking down users early and often.
In many cases, under investigation, the ‘security risk’ has been blow enormously out of proportion. In many other cases the ‘security risk’ doesn’t exist at all.
It has been my observation that some IT support people have discovered that it is much easier to stop their users doing things than it is to enable them to do more. When your IT support team says you can’t have access to a system feature because of ‘security concerns’ insist that they produce a coherent business justification.
Wed 16 Aug 2006
A case where even a very big company struggled to get procurement of server hardware right and it could have costs tens of thousands.
One of our customers bought a very expensive 6 figure phone system to support their Auckland site and branches around New Zealand. At the core of this system the phone vendor had supplied an HP server to run the telephone software. After installation and some cost blowout the system was deemed commissioned and the phone vendor wanted to hand over maintenance of the server to LANcom Technology.
This was fine except that when we researched the server with HP we found that the server only had a standard next business day warranty. This was woefully inadequate. The company was making $30,000 of phone sales a day as well all their other business calls. If the server had failed over the weekend and a support call was logged on Monday morning it could have taken until Tuesday afternoon for HP to respond. This was clearly unsatisfactory.
We have upgraded the server to a 6 hour call to repair warranty and we are exploring having a hot spare with the customer. Lack of attention to detail in the procurement of equipment could have seen tens of thousands of dollars in lost sales.
— Next Page »